March 6, 2026 min
13 min
🎧 Listen now on:
Spotify,
Apple Podcasts,
or watch on
YouTube.
Imagine someone living with dementia repeatedly asking for their husband who died years ago. You tell them the truth. They look at you as though you’ve just broken their heart – again.
In this powerful solo episode, Andy Baker explores one of the most emotionally complex dilemmas in dementia care: Should we always reorientate someone to the facts? Or can blunt honesty cause repeated trauma?
This episode is essential listening for caregivers, foster carers, parents, educators and health professionals working in trauma-informed environments.
Many carers are taught that honesty is always the right approach. But dementia changes how memory and emotional processing work. A factual correction can land like a fresh bereavement – over and over again.
Andy explores:
This is not about lying. It is about understanding the nervous system of the person in front of you.
A central principle in behaviour support and trauma-informed care is simple:
When someone is distressed, their amygdala is activated. Facts will not settle an alarmed nervous system. Safety, empathy and co-regulation might.
Instead of correcting, we can:
This approach applies not only in dementia care, but across schools, fostering, parenting and behaviour support settings.
Andy draws powerful parallels between dementia care and:
When someone reacts strongly, the question is rarely “Why are they doing this?” but rather:
What need is underneath this behaviour?
Much dementia-related distress improves when we focus on:
This isn’t about fancy interventions. It’s about structured compassion.
Connection isn’t a soft extra. It is often the intervention.
If we correct without connecting, we risk escalating distress. If we empathise first, we create safety – and safety allows regulation.
This episode challenges us to rethink honesty, behaviour support, caregiving and trauma-informed practice – with compassion at the centre.
Recommended Training – Click Below to Find Out More: